Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Henry Grey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one "keep" opinion is unpersuasive, as all cited sources are genealogical - handbooks of peerages and such.  Sandstein  19:16, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

George Henry Grey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can see no notability whatsoever here. No honours. Not senior enough for any inherent notability. Why is he notable? Looks like a genealogical article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 09:02, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 14:37, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Humanity's longstanding fascination with aristocrats means that this scion of the nobility and his activities can undoubtedly be sourced more broadly (searches of the London papers of his era), although his position as heir to a viscount and the sources already in the article establish notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Being able to find sources of his life events and being notable enough for a Wikipedia article are very far from being the same thing. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:18, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SOLDIER. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:25, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.