Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George K Turyasingura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Firm consensus that as an anglican bishop he is presumed notable, as well as a degree of sufficient sourcing (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 16:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

George K Turyasingura

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to pass WP:ANYBIO - no third-party coverage. Yunshui 雲 水 14:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  15:05, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uganda-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  15:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 15:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep: Angican bishops are generally notable, and it isn't hard to find significant coverage in independent sources for this one. This is a recently created article that needs substantial cleanup - it's not a good move to pull the trigger on a deletion nomination so soon. In other words, multiple transgressions of WP:BEFORE. StAnselm (talk) 04:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, historic AFD consensus is that Catholic bishops are presumed notable because they almost always pass WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 14:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete we lack the reliable source articles to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:29, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No we don't. Did you read the one I linked to? StAnselm (talk) 02:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep subject is an Anglican bishop. Anglican, Lutheran, Orthodox, Methodist, and Catholic bishops are notable. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 06:10, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Bishops in the Anglican communion are generally notable. The lack of penetration of the Internet may make it difficult to get sources, but that does not affect its probable truth or notability.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Long consensus is that Anglican bishops are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:05, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * General consensus here is that "Anglican bishops are notable by default", so I'm assuming we have that enshrined somewhere. I did check, prior to nominating, to see whether we had a WP:NBISHOP or similar notability guideline for Anglicism and couldn't find one; would someone be kind enough to point me to it, so that I don't make this mistake again? Much obliged! Yunshui 雲 水 14:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES summarises AfD consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that - didn't think to check the common outcome pages, only notability. In light of that, and the overwhelming slew of Keep !votes above, I Withdraw the nomination (although since there is at least one !vote to delete, this still needs closing properly by someone else). Yunshui 雲 水 19:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.