Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Mackenzie (Australian soldier)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:24, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

George Mackenzie (Australian soldier)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Don't see anything in this article to suggest notability. As a colonel fails WP:SOLDIER. Not notable IMO Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * delete The only source is a short human interest story which does verify the details of the article but which also verifies that these details don't add up to him being a person of sufficient note. A search restricted to his name and the Shrine only returned three hundred results, which excepting the story used as a reference all appear to be routine coverage. Mangoe (talk) 16:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing to distinguish him from the vast majority of other Australian soldiers at the same time.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet GNG or SOLDIER. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 01:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.