Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Marvin Stone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 03:09, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

George Marvin Stone

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can find no notability to meet WP:BIO guidelines on this person. The originating editor assured me he'd work to improve the article and outline the notability beyond the subject's being a pastor at a historical church. He hasn't returned since. ju66l3r (talk) 17:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep he appears to be the author of a number of books as well. Online sources are problematic due to the period in which he lived. I'd hold off to see what else can be found, otherwise delete. Travellingcari (talk) 17:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, there are a number of news reports, but most seem to involve his obit and or being named to various parishes and none about his books. If something is found, he can be re-created. Travellingcari (talk) 19:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as sub-sub-sub-stub and A3 speedy delete. An article on the guy would be ok, but this is a telephone book entry.  Utgard Loki (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's little sourcing available to the public, little information given that could possibly be of relevance to anyone anywhere. -Kmaguir1 (talk) 19:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral Please wait before closing. I'm building it up from meager sources found through NY Times and Google Books. Guy was notable in his day, but it remains to be seen whether he deserves a page. High society pastor, stayed in all the social status spots (Saratoga, Nantucket). Let me work on it for a few hours. BusterD (talk) 02:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.