Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Panikulam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Hagennos  ❯❯❯  Talk  14:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

George Panikulam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All sources that are quoted are primary sources are not reliable. Fails WP:GNG Hagennos  ❯❯❯  Talk  14:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as a consecrated bishop of the Catholic Church and an Apostolic Nuncio. Per WP:CLERGY, we routinely consider all consecrated Catholic bishops as notable, but the fact that he is an Apostolic Nuncio to a predominately Catholic country (one that does not speak English at that), means that there will be abundant sourcing as the is the pope's personal representative there and has to be present at the installation of all other bishops in the country, which means there will be abundant (non-English) press about him simply because the position is so high-profile. The fact that he is an Indian bishop serving as a nuncio in a non-Anglophone region is likely why it is more difficult to find press, but we can be positive they exist simply by the position, and the primary sourcing in the article is enough for WP:V. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.