Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Piggins Medal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to South Sydney Rabbitohs. That seems to be agreeable to most partIcipants.  Sandstein  08:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

George Piggins Medal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No indication of WP:notability. No independent sources. Purely a club honour. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, subject to possible merger to the team article. Multiple sources are found at GNews.  But unless there's substantially more to say about this than just a list of the honorees, I'd think it would be better included as content in the main team article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 22:58, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Normally merging to the team article would be sensible, as it's not a very notable award (despite one article about it). However, South Sydney Rabbitohs is already rather long, so we may want to break some of that article out into a separate article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Comment No other NRL teams appear to have a separate article for their player of the year awards. Such lists are usually part of a club's 'Records' or 'Honours' articles.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 02:19, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  05:13, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. relevent to the team. Wether it deserves a stand alone article is seperate. It belongs somewhere, wether in South Sydney Rabbitohs or elsewhere. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and Merge to main article, the length of the original article should not be a factor in determining if it gets split out.  &theta;v&xi;r     mag&xi;   spellbook 08:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You can't do both, if you are merging the history needs to be kept as attribution. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:09, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.