Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Siopsis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

George Siopsis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to meet the notability guideline for Academics nonsense ferret  19:39, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment His h index is 20. I do not know if that is high or low for this field.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:33, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Theoretical physics is a high citation field in which his citation record doesn't stand out to me. And his cv shows nothing else that could help pass WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:27, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.