Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Spencer-Churchill, Marquess of Blandford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. apparent consensus  DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

George Spencer-Churchill, Marquess of Blandford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A guy born in 1992 with no evidence of any independent notability. Notability is not inherited. Belonging to a notable family does not confer automatic notability. Tadeusz Nowak (talk) 00:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I would think that someone who owned Blenheim Palace, one of the most visited stately homes in the UK where Winston Churchill was born, would be bound to have been noticed in reliable sources. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  01:52, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Generally we do keep articles on the heirs to British peerages, as when they inherit they will be entitled to articles by virtue of their position. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:52, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:52, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * That may have been true in the past, but peers are no longer automatically entitled to seats in the House of Lords so they will not automatically be entitled to Wikipedia articles by virtue of their position. 82.9.185.151 (talk) 14:56, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * This has been discussed before and general opinion has been that it would be illogical to break the series of articles on hereditary peers just because they no longer sit in Parliament. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:42, 18 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Heirs to British peerages are notable. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:30, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - per long-standing consensus, cited above, and then there's this, this and this. Kraxler (talk) 19:05, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.