Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Uribe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. --PeaceNT (talk) 16:26, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

George Uribe

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This individual is non-notable. Article is strictly promotional; not encyclopedic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainmaker2005 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment - Procedural relisting from malformed nom. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No vote yet The person seems notable enough in his career. As of yet there are no sources however. Northwestgnome (talk) 18:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Seems notable enough, it just lacks sources as Northwestgnome remarks. I think though such sources can be found.  So # Why  18:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep also. I have a problem with the sourcing also, but since it's not self-promotional I'd say give the article a chance to flourish. --Quartermaster (talk) 18:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Take a look at this item: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-63312712.html (and note that the George Uribe described in the highbeam item also has a master's degree from George Washington University). Sometimes what makes someone notable is the bad stuff. --Eastmain (talk) 18:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I see no evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 20:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep The article seems notable, it just needs sources. Definitely not a vanity page, if that is what you are thinking. Tezkag72 (talk) 21:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, none of those things listed in the bio adds up to notability.  Corvus cornix  talk  21:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Solid keep as the topic is frequently covered, both in passing and substantially in reliable sources,:. Notability not in doubt given the Keyes' and Jenkins campaigns and associated controversy. No concerns about writing a verifiable, neutral, non-stub article on the topic. Skomorokh  13:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.