Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Vanous


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 10:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

George Vanous

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not an especially notable individual, Only claim to notability seems to be some small MMORPG or working for microsoft, Possibly created by the person who is the subject of the article. Google searches yield minimal reliable sources as well.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 21:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete created by Vanous so most likely a WP:COI. Non-notable. IrishGuy talk 21:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * While George Vanous is no Scott Isaacs, he has built notable sites like the click-less gallery and has engineered declarative-syntax AJAX framweworks in uncommon ways. Vanous 22:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, fails WP:BIO and other notability guidelines. Possible G11 speedy for the number of external links.  Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:19, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - like TenPoundHammer said it fails WP:BIO. It's completely unsourced and on top of all that, like Irishguy says it looks like it was created in breach of WP:COI-- Cailil   talk 23:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:BIO. Sourcing is weak (the subject gets minimal return on searches), the conflict of interest is concerning. Tony Fox (arf!) 03:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO. Interesting work, no notability. --Dhartung | Talk 04:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Obvious autobiography, but not by itself, the only reason to delete.  Violates WP:N and WP:V. Bearian 19:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.