Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George W. Bush military service controversy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy keep, troll (earlier nominated George W. Bush article itself for Afd) -- Curps 00:53, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

George W. Bush military service controversy
Do we really need another article that exists entirely to attack bush over his supposed "controversies"?--Ham and jelly butter 18:46, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'm all for deleting paranoid theories that never make it outside of blogs and tabloids, but this one was on the nightly news every night. (Dan Rather has documents proving that it belongs on Wikipedia.)  BigDT 19:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * comment the dan rather "documents" aren't a very compelling case for anyhting, other than a paragraph in the liberal bias article, which i'll be happy to add once this is deleted--Ham and jelly butter 19:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * comment I know - I was being sarcastic ... my apologies ... sarcasm doesn't get transmitted too well in print. BigDT 19:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep as a valid subpage of George W. Bush. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 19:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * comment wouldn't POV fork be a better description than subpage?--Ham and jelly butter 19:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think so on this one. It's not like the controversy wasn't well documented during two entire elections.  --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 19:15, 7 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep it is clearly notable and was well documented and commented upon during both elections and throughout his presidency. IrishGuy 19:38, 7 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.