Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Washington (inventor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep no argument given, nomination is in defiance of the reference section. It's also a featured article linked from the main page. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 03:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

George Washington (inventor)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject may be non-notable after all. Xiner (talk, a promise) 02:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Uh, this guy is real, right? Not a fake article? Then i don't see why it shouldn't be kept. dposse 02:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and close. Not a good AFJ.  --Dennisthe2 02:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Change vote to Delete, the article was the AFJ. Fallout, anybody? --Dennisthe2 03:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * keep is this a joke? Nom makes no meaningful argument,... --W.marsh 03:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * speedy keep this was a featured article for crying out loud.--Ted-m 03:07, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.