Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georges Khabbaz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 00:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Georges Khabbaz

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability, factual accuracy is dubious. I propose a deletion. bender235 (talk) 13:05, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions.  —ManicSpider (talk) 15:09, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —ManicSpider (talk) 15:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —ManicSpider (talk) 15:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —ManicSpider (talk) 15:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep I've added some sources just in the Cinema section (there are probably more sources to be found in the theater and TV areas - plus this which I wasn't sure if it added anything, so I left it out) and on the basis of those, coupled with his Murex d'Or wins, I'd suggest he passes WP:GNG and WP:ENT. The article certainly needs to be tidied, and it doesn't help that everything seems to have at least two names, with Khabbaz's name being spelled at least 4 different ways I found. But still, salvageable. - ManicSpider (talk) 16:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Subject meets WP:ARTIST criteria. Eli  +  17:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - good job, ManicSpider! I'd have said the Murex d'Or would probably have motivated a keep, but with the extra sources added to the article I believe he definitely meets WP:ENT. --bonadea contributions talk 17:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep- Now the subject is well sourced, it meets WP:ENT-- Rirunmot (talk) 20:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep- Though there seems to be an IP intent on not following the WP:AFD procedure, they at least certainly seem to be making a conscientious effort to improve the article in accordance with WP:ENT --Doriftu  Speak Up.  10:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I note that it's the same IP that created the article. While I'm here, I don't suppose anyone can work out the correct spelling of the TV and Theater listing with numerals in them? I'm assuming that the random 2s are Google Translate stuffing up somewhere. - ManicSpider (talk) 10:42, 5 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - per WP:ARTIST and WP:ENT, the subject meets both.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.