Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia–Kenya relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star  Mississippi  13:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Georgia–Kenya relations

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. There really isn't much to these relations, no embassies, no agreements. The article includes factoids such as Georgia supporting Kenya against terrorism and a bunch of Kenyan musicians performing in Georgia. LibStar (talk) 02:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I remember when these "X-Y relations" articles were as prominent in AFD as "List of people on the postage stamps of X" is right now. Synthesis of every random time two random countries crossed paths, not notable in its own right. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:09, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with the nominator's rationale. The article is well written and the content is backed by WP:RS but WP:GNG isn't met for the precise article topic. Chirota (talk) 06:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Partial Merge I agree with the above two editors, but I would hate to see this well-cited, well-written information get lost from Wikipedia. Could we merge some of this content into other relevant pages? It seems rather wasteful to delete it outright, given its quality and non-trivial nature. DeVosMax [ contribs • talk • created media ] 06:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Is information like " Kenyan musicians were among the international artists to participate in an international music festival" worth merging? LibStar (talk) 06:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * While it is hilarious, I recognize that's not grounds for keeping it around. That said, I think the other two paragraphs are worth merging. DeVosMax [ contribs • talk • created media ] 07:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, not sure how we can consider such topics as non-notable. There are evidences of bilateral relations, degree of such relationship may be debatable, but based on what the article talks I don't see any reason to delete it. ☆★  Mamushir   ( ✉✉ ) 10:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * There is no inherent notability of bilateral relations, hundreds of these articles have been deleted. Yes there are some relations, but it is questionable whether the relationship is notable and passes GNG. LibStar (talk) 03:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 03:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 03:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 03:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * delete. Per lack of independent, reliable sources. Yilloslime (talk) 03:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete regardless of how well the article is written, this cannot overcome its lack of notability. MaxnaCarter (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.