Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia–Luxembourg relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 03:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Georgia–Luxembourg relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another completely random combination. non resident embassies, you would think almost all relations would be Georgia-EU context. Georgian foreign ministry says trade is less than USD1000 each way! unless this is an error? LibStar (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per the European Council connection making their diplomacy moderately notable. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► hemicycle ─╢ 11:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * does not prove actual bilateral relations only relations in multilateral context, eg at European Council meetings. LibStar (talk) 11:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm well aware of that, but I consider countries in such a partnership to have a "special relationship" with each other, and their mutual membership of the EuroCouncil would affect their bilateral relations. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► hemicycle ─╢ 11:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You're clearly venturing into synthesis if not original research. Drawn Some (talk) 11:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Lack of significant in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources of the subject of the article, relations between Georgia and Luxembourg, likely because there is no notable relationship to document. No evidence of trade, or bilateral projects, treaties, war, diplomacy, exchange students, etc. Drawn Some (talk) 11:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete "EU connections" are insufficient. No trade, nothing to make this worth the paper used.  Collect (talk) 11:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Article mentions "Argentina" (copy/paste error). It also mentions Moscow so it seems fair to conclude that there are no notable relations. Fails Bilateral relations. Johnuniq (talk) 12:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent coverage of the topic as a whole. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  23:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 04:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 04:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable sources adress these relations in any detail. Hipocrite (talk) 20:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.