Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia–Netherlands relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Sedd&sigma;n talk|WikimediaUK 00:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Georgia–Netherlands relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

whilst these 2 countries have embassies, there is a distinct lack of coverage of bilateral relations, all coverage seems in multilateral context or football. . I note the article creator provided this link Georgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs about the relation with the Netherlands which is actually a link to the embassy in Belarus. most relations between these 2 nations is in a Georgia-EU context. I note this from the Georgian foreign ministry which seemed a nice talk between the two countries but no actual agreements signed. LibStar (talk) 10:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge into single Netherlands article. No need for every combination and permutation. Not notable singly. Collect (talk) 13:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is better handled at Foreign relations of Georgia and Foreign relations of Netherlands, per the emerged consensus on handling these pages. JJL (talk) 15:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - true, Sandra Roelofs, the first lady of Georgia, is Dutch, but in terms of significant coverage of "Georgia–Netherlands relations", that's not to be found, so we should delete. - Biruitorul Talk 17:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N. Edison (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another random pairing of countries that doesn't show notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete not inherently notable, no matter how much trivia an potentially be crammed into it. Dahn (talk) 09:18, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Article has no useful content and very little prospect of expansion. No sources indicate these relations are notable. Fails notability. Johnuniq (talk) 09:45, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Utterly trivial. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  03:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per everyone above. If someone comes along and provides a keep argument, I'll think about it. Yilloslime T C  02:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.