Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia–Portugal relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Closed a bit early per WP:SNOW. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Georgia–Portugal relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination from the obsessive creator. the statement about the South Ossetia War can easily be covered in International reaction to the 2008 South Ossetia war. LibStar (talk) 07:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - as noted, the only facet of this "relationship" can easily be mentioned in a more appropriate place; other than that, there isn't anything to see here. - Biruitorul Talk 07:43, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As noted, the little bit of information here can be mentioned elsewhere (Foreign relations of Portugal, Foreign relations of Georgia, etc.) There's nothing here that merits a special article. Mandsford (talk) 12:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't need it's own article, but on one of the countries main articles if need be. Renaissancee (talk) 12:54, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for all the usual reasons. JJL (talk) 04:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin, editor has the exact same comments in 3 other AfDs. Ikip (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, not likely to be found so. This article borders on being a mere dictionary entry. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  17:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * delete Yet another bilateral stub failing guideline for notability. Also seems like a directory entry; Wikipedia is not a directory. Edison (talk) 05:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since no reliable sources discuss this relationship in any manner but the trivial, an encyclopedia article on this topic can not be supported.Bali ultimate (talk) 13:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.