Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia–Saudi Arabia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:31, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Georgia–Saudi Arabia relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. There really isn't much to these relations besides diplomatic recognition and a Georgian embassy LibStar (talk) 17:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment Not much, but there is some discussion of trade relations. The other stuff is mostly the normal PR 'make nice' stuff.
 * "Georgia : Foreign Ministers of Georgia and Saudi Arabia Talked about the Dynamic of Relations between the Two Countries." Mena Report. 2018. HighBeam Research. (March 3, 2018). ["Georgia,Saudi Arabia : Georgia Reaches Agreement to Export Sheep Meat to Saudi Arabia." Mena Report. 2017. HighBeam Research. (March 3, 2018). https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-494794191.html Article link]
 * "Georgia,Saudi Arabia : Georgia Reaches Agreement to Export Sheep Meat to Saudi Arabia." Mena Report. 2017. HighBeam Research. (March 3, 2018). Article link
 * "Saudi Arabia Lifts Ban on Imports of Cattle, Sheep and Goats from Georgia and and Chicks from Belgium." WAM - United Arab Emirates News Agency. 2015. HighBeam Research. (March 3, 2018). Article link
 * The sheep exports are of some significance because SA must source enormous numbers of sheep for sacrifice during the Hajj. Not enough for a Keep here but it is worth looking deeper. Jbh  Talk  19:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 02:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not seeing the kinds of sources (i.e., "significant" coverage in reliable, independent sources) needed to establish notability. Yilloslime T C  00:55, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Did not find anything other than what I noted above which is not sufficient to pass GNG. Jbh  Talk  03:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Date is provided as a notable property of this article, plus it is an open door if further developments occur. It could also be added that Saudi Arabia recognises Georgia's territorial integrity over the two breakaway states. --Juicy Oranges (talk) 15:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * if further developments occur is WP:CRYSTAL. LibStar (talk) 15:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * It is not CRYSTAL whatsoever. The bedrock of my position is that ties exist and this warrants the article. Saying that the page is ready for future development (which is inevitable in the circumstance, a departure from CRYSTAL) is more an additional point than an argument for keep. --Juicy Oranges (talk) 08:38, 18 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.