Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia–Slovakia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Georgia–Slovakia relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination. According to the Georgian govt, only one head of state visit (and that was for a multilateral conference) and only 1 actual bilateral agreement. Most media coverage is in a multilateral context eg with Ukraine etc, only 1 article I find mentioning the 1 bilateral agreement. not really rescuable. LibStar (talk) 06:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge despite pleas of helping merge these articles, nominator continues to noiminate new articles. I have already collected all of this information to merge, so this is a pointless empty gesture, an argument over a redirect, not an article. Ikip (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note. Neither of the above can be considered "votes" since the former is simply 'per nom'- an argument to avoid- na dt'other is just copied and pasted, with respect to Ikip.

Merge to relevant foreign relations articles. and are not enough notability for an article but it's worthy of an entry somewhere. HJMitchell   You rang?  00:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I added some external links. They may indicate potential, but do not make an article. Aymatth2 (talk) 02:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, random X-Y article. Newspaper articles containing words Slovakia and Georgia do not establish encyclopedical notability, formal diplomatic statements neither. For Slovaks Georgia could teleport to the Mars and nobody would notice. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 17:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete No notable relations, per Bilateral relations. Johnuniq (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails to achieve notability as does not have sufficient in-depth independent coverage of the topic. The Georgian and Slovakian journalists and authors need to get busy. Drawn Some (talk) 11:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Not worst case by far, though, as they has a communist past. Collect (talk) 11:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * but wouldn't that relate to Czechoslovakia-Soviet Union relations? LibStar (talk) 11:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Pretty much and neither one of those countries exists these days. Drawn Some (talk) 14:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No sourced content, only News items in external links. Fails notability by having o coverage of the topic as a whole. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  23:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 04:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 04:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Seems to have no notable relations. Hobartimus (talk) 15:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No relaible sources adress these relations in any detail. Hipocrite (talk) 20:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.