Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia–South Korea relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Georgia–South Korea relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination. this link http://www.mofat.go.kr/english/regions/europe/20070803/1_307.jsp? says it all. no real high level agreements, no respective embassies, no trade agreements. LibStar (talk) 00:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, I particularly enjoyed the statement from your link "number of Koreans living in Georgia: 10". No sourced information about any encyclopedia-worthy relations between these two countries, and I can't think of any particular situation in the past that has lead to these countries interacting in any substantial manner. It does indeed seem to be a random and unnecessary country relations pairing that does not have any content for an article at this point. ~  mazca  t 00:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as noncontroversial. --Mr Accountable (talk) 01:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * that's hardly a reason Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 01:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Moreover, both countries have issues with communist/post-communist governments. --Mr Accountable (talk) 02:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * even if that is true the article is about relations between them not what they have in common. LibStar (talk) 02:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Can't we declare a moratorium on all United Nations' members bilateral relations articles? Sockpuppets, crazy messages in the edit summary space, 3 or 4 new deletions a day, it's getting ridiculous.  I'm getting worn out looking for pertinent links in various forms of government documentation.  --Mr Accountable (talk) 03:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

you have provided not one reliable source to keep any article you've voted to keep. There is no moratorium, articles are assessed through the valid process of WP:AFD. LibStar (talk) 03:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - a relationship so notable that the "Georgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs" page simply says "under construction". ~ Excesses ~  (talk) 15:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 17:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources establishing notability here. - Biruitorul Talk 18:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: too unnoteworthy. Alexius08 (talk) 00:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Once again, a randomly created article that does nothing to assert notability in world affairs, and is not likely to be able to. -- BlueSquadron Raven  16:17, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.