Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia–Uruguay relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 07:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Georgia–Uruguay relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

no resident ambassadors, no history of diplomatic relations. http://www.mfa.gov.ge/index.php?sec_id=371&lang_id=ENG another random country pairing. LibStar (talk) 07:23, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no embassies, no sources, nothing to indicate a shred of notability; random pairing. - Biruitorul Talk 16:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a collection of miscellaneous juxtapositions of countries, nor a directory of which do or do not exchange diplomats. Fails notability as well. Edison (talk) 17:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Though I don't think that's one of the WP:NOT rules, there's no relationship here. Even the article itself concedes that if they need to talk to each other about something, it's between their offices at the UN Building.  The link is a wrong number.  Anyway, we don't need an article to tell us that there are no Georgia-Uruguay relations.   Mandsford (talk) 19:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Once again, a randomly created article that does nothing to assert notability in world affairs, and is not likely to be able to. -- BlueSquadron Raven  15:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep pending outcome of discussion at the Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 00:25, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * the above cannot be considered a vote for keep, it does not assess the notability of relations. LibStar (talk) 01:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The discussion at Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations is directly related to Wikipedia_talk:Notability. Deletion could preempt the result of the discussion which could see the development of additional criteria for notability. You have ignored requests not to continue nominating these articles for deletion until the centralized discussion on notability has been resolved. This behavior is rather disruptive. Martintg (talk) 01:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, per Piotrus. Martintg (talk) 01:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * the above cannot be considered a vote for keep, it does not assess the notability of relations. LibStar (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 10:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 10:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 10:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.