Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 21:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Mid-level administrative subdivision of Seventh Day Adventist Church. Appears to fail WP:CORP, lacking stand-alone notability. I can foresee either an outright deletion, or a merge up to the national church article, and leave it up to the community to determine its fate. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have added sources, it now passes WP:GNG. --TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 03:42, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Rather large organization with plenty of hits. If this doesn't meet notability, what do we do with all the articles on small organizations? WikiManOne (talk) 03:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep -- an organisation with 150 churches and 50 schools ought to be notable. We have articles on Anglican dioceses, so why not the equivalent for other denominations.  Nevertheless, I would have exoected to see a few more blue links in the article.  Does it need wikifying? Peterkingiron (talk) 15:15, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.