Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia – Malaysia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I will restore the content behind a redirect if someone wants to merge, but the consensus appears to be delete. Protonk (talk) 00:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Georgia – Malaysia relations

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:GNG. could not find any coverage of bilateral relations. no evidence of state visits, significant trade, migration, agreements, disputes etc. only coverage I could find related to the Georgia (U.S. state). Those wanting to keep must provide evidence of third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 03:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per no GNG Someone65 (talk) 20:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge any useful info which can obtained into the respective foreign relations articles and redirect to the Georgia article.--TM 05:19, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see nor have I found any useful info. LibStar (talk) 05:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * This has useful information. WP:BEFORE.--TM 15:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * yep all there is diplomatic recognition, very low trade and non resident embassies. that's it. LibStar (talk) 03:56, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Which is why I suggest we use that content and merge it into the respective relations articles. It is verifiable info, it just does not pass WP:GNG yet.--TM 04:14, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge as suggested. Even quanta of useful evidence should be kept, even if not as a separate article. Bearian (talk) 18:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: insignificant relationship that fails the GNG. There's nothing of any use that should be merged -- the country foreign relations article should contain important details only and ignore trivial "relationships". The relationships are so insignificant to each country that any mention at all in their respective foreign relations articles would be undue weight. Even so, the merge would be of such minor content that it wouldn't really be a merge at all.--Mkativerata (talk) 01:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mkativerata. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.