Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Ann Laster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 10:38, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Georgia Ann Laster

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not sure if she satisfies WP:SINGER. There's this obituary, but not a lot more. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment There is quite a lot about her in newspaper archives. Beyond the Fulbright and other awards, she was quite a success. It's going to take me at least a few days to get through newspaper articles about her and request information through interlibrary loan if necessary, but anyone else interested in looking for sources will doubtless find quite a few. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 11:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as satisfies WP:SINGER #1: "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." The reviews are plentiful online and not limited to what is in the article at present. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 12:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - In agreement with the previous voter. Some facts from her biography, such as winning a Fulbright and appearing at the Hollywood Bowl, are reliably cited now thanks to DiamondRemley's additions. Also, a Google Books search reveals several appearances in books on black women in classical music (e.g. Just Tell the Story by W.G. Still et al., 2006). There is not very much info available, but enough for an acceptable stub article.  DOOMSDAYER 520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 15:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep satisfies WP:SINGER as noted above but also receives SIGCOV in multiple reliable sources so she even passes WP:GNG. --Tsistunagiska (talk) 14:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of in-depth coverage in newspapers to pass WP:GNG. - Whisperjanes (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Clearly meets notability criteria for WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 19:58, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.