Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Fowler (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Although a late one, there is a consensus that Fowler has enough sources that pass WP:GNG while also passing WP:NMODEL. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:15, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Georgia Fowler
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Model with inadequate evidence of notability-- no substantial references  DGG ( talk ) 05:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Lacks significant sources and coverage. --Danozzz (talk) 08:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BASIC. Clear failure of WP:BEFORE. See here 1 2, Vogue and Harper's Bazaar are both RS publications for fashion. Please do the necessary work to substantiate an AfD, and explain your reasoning (not a one-sentence proposal unless the case is really, really straight forward) before wiping out the work of other editors. FOARP (talk) 09:29, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * It can be difficult in this field to distinguish between PR and encyclopedic coverage. Of the references mentioned above, perhaps a case could be made for the first being actual journalism, but I do not think it could for the second.  DGG ( talk ) 02:18, 15 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete PR coverage is not a sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:51, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. No third-party in-depth coverage. The Vogue article is an interview and not WP:RS for notability purposes. Fails WP:NMODEL. Narky Blert (talk) 15:05, 15 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Lady was featured in two news article in The Sydney Morning Herald and in Arab News and another Australia newspaper; refs added to article.--the eloquent peasant (talk) 21:08, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * See also here in Harper's Bazaar. --the eloquent peasant (talk) 00:48, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:NACTOR states notability is met if the model "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following." Georgia has 780K followers on her Instagram. That seems like a large fan base. The company she models for, Victoria Secret, has the 8th largest following on Instagram.--the eloquent peasant (talk) 10:10, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I added a few more references to fashion magazines that feature interviews with Fowler and a couple from News Corp Australia Network. The Victoria Secret Instagram following is over 63,531,983. Would the fact that she's one of their top representatives help her notability case? --the eloquent peasant (talk) 20:51, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:21, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:51, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep TV presenter as well as model, meets GNG. MurielMary (talk) 10:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:31, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Victorias Secret Fashion Show is huge. Inclusion in three is a major gig. Definitely keep. Kevinh456 (talk) 06:50, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Three Victoria's Secret shows + presenting Project Runway New Zealand should satisfy WP:NMODEL. Bondegezou (talk) 17:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Although some of the references seem like 'fluff pieces', enough are from sufficiently reliable sources to make her notable. Ross Finlayson (talk) 16:18, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable and enough of the references are good. (Dushan Jugum (talk) 19:41, 4 January 2019 (UTC)).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.