Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Gould (Labour Party Member)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 08:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Georgia Gould (Labour Party Member)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

'''Strong Delete ''' The controversy incident is not notable under wiki.

Apart from that the article is self-promotional and there are no notable achievement to warrant such a page.

Wiki an encyclopedia and georgia gould has not achieved any other significance. Thousands of students pass through Oxford colleges each year - this is no reason for inclusion. Neither is working for the Tony Blair Faith Foundation.

As the subject has failed to demonstate notable grounds for continued inclusion - the debate should be opened as to wtheter to keep the page.--WikiKing2012 (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep There are multiple third-party, independent reliable sources supporting her notability. Notability is (partly) measured through such sources. Since reliable newspapers have given her prominence, she's notable under Wikipedia guidelines. (BTW, I completed this nomination for you, which involved some administrative work as you failed to include the parenthesis.) The JPS talk to me  20:33, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Cool - didn't know about that!--WikiKing2012 (talk) 21:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

NOTE User:WikiKing2012 has been indef-blocked as a sockpuppet of User:BirminghamAV. See Sockpuppet investigations/BirminghamAV/Archive for details. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 21:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- - SpacemanSpiff Calvin&#8225;Hobbes 21:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: this nomination was mistakenly placed in the log for Aug 2. It is fixed now. Tim Song (talk) 21:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- - SpacemanSpiff Calvin&#8225;Hobbes 21:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. Being related to a notable person does not confer notability. Her involvement in the dispute over a candidacy is a better claim, but this is too much like WP:NOTNEWS. If she gets significant coverage independently of this incident and not too heavily tied into her more famous relatives, that would be a different matter. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, her alleged 'notability' stems from her father (WP:NOTINHERITED), and her failed bid to be a candidate (WP:POLITICIAN, WP:NOTNEWS) In any event, she isn't there yet --Saalstin (talk) 01:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete a perhaps a candidate of a major party for a national legislature is notable, but not someone who tries to become such a nominee, but does not succeed. DGG (talk) 04:33, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO. The only thing that approaches notability is the incident of an attempt to be selected as a candidate. Frankly, it would have been more notable if there had been no allegation of irregularity in such a contest: there is no verification that the incident is significant. Johnuniq (talk) 03:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. In wondering why someone was anxious enough to delete this article that they created several puppets, I did some research. It appears that this article may have merit per WP:GNG, even if failing WP:POLITICIAN . MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 21:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Both as a failed 2005 candidate she is NN, and a non-adopted prospective parliamentary candidate, she is NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:49, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.