Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Horsley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Georgia Horsley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A BLP-violating train wreck of an article, tagged as problematic for nine years and full of unsourced and borderline libellous content. A search for sources only seems to bring back tabloids, which isn't an acceptable solution. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  22:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  22:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:16, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:16, 26 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nomimation, have also looked to rescue/improve the sources with nothing reliable easy to find Joseywales1961 (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable, did not meet WP:GNG.--Richie Campbell (talk) 23:51, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per Nom. There is severe notability issues. A search returned things like "Jones Wife: Who is Georgia Jones and what does she do", "Who is Danny Jones wife Georgia Horsley? Former Miss ..." and other links involving Danny Jones. A problem is that notability is not inherited. She won Miss England 2007 that lands in the middle of WP:BLP1E. It might be argued that she competed in the Miss World 2007 pageant, but placing 18th is two shy of of the listed top 16 for any notability. The sources on the article are equivalent to what can be found on a search. Although acceptable for content they do not advance notability.  Otr500 (talk) 01:36, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Too much passing mention sourcing. We have decided that beauty queens are not default notable, we just have yet to see people apply this ruling against older articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per . There's a major BLP violation, too. Bearian (talk) 20:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.