Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia for Georgians

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.'' The result was keep (non-admin closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:04, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Georgia for Georgians

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is ostensibly not about the actual slogan. The slogan itself does not appear to comply with WP:NPOV anyway. SourAcidHoldout (talk) 21:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 17.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 21:32, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:06, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:06, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:06, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Silly nom by inexperienced editor (see ANI now) Johnbod (talk) 03:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Does look to be a notable topic, with sufficient coverage to establish this. The article may need cleaning up but when you having an article about a slogan/doctrine you have to name it as that slogan and then write about it in a NPOV way. Davewild (talk) 18:13, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. If there are coatrack issues, they can be resolved through discussion and editing.  There does seem to be coverage, even if this article may need cleanup:  from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,  from The Geography of Ethnic Violence by Monica Toft,  from The Wall Street Journal (probably more of a primary source than anything else, but still...), etc. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.