Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia gubernatorial election, 2006

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!)  13:41, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Georgia gubernatorial election, 2006
do we need this article with such mispelled title Melaen 23:05, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy ? delete because. No, mispelling needs correction, not deletion. But would have said . Gtabary 23:09, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep I wrote this article because I noticed that a number of gubernatorial pages had been set up but not written. I have been attempting to correct my spelling errors since I posted the article. If you find a spelling problem, please feel free to fix it. However, I do not believe minor spelling errors to be justification for deletion. 7 June 7:57 EST.
 * Is Gtabary saying delete or keep? I can't tell. 7 June 8:00 EST.
 * The bold section is the usual format. So I said delete (because). :-) Gtabary 23:55, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * I looked through the requirements for deletion. Spelling errors were not listed as justification. Thus far, that appears to be the only complaint. - The Author
 * This is the Author again. I have fixed as many spelling errors as I could. If you have found a problem I missed, please fix it yourself or post here so I know what to fix.
 * Keep and cleanup Upcoming elections are an exception to the "crystal ball" rule. Xoloz 00:18, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * For other articles on upcoming elections see the article on the 2008 U.S. Presidential Campaign as well as the articles on the 2006 Senate and House elections.
 * Keep. What, exactly, is misspelled in the title? In any event, notable and predictable future exercises of the political process are not "crystal ball" cases. -- BD2412 talk 00:33, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks fine. - Mustafaa 01:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and Expand, no misspellings as far as I can tell. Certainly no one would suggest that the U.S. presidential election, 2004 article should have been deleted when it was created in January of 2003.  Why should a gubernatorial race be any different? -  Jersyko    talk   02:33, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Indeed, "gubernatorial" is spelled correctly. Since it's an upcoming election, I'd vote keep on this or any gubernatorial articles which have an election date of November 2006 and find themselves up for deletion. Mike H 17:06, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with Mike H. --Lst27 ( t a l k )  22:05, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .