Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgina Bencsik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 03:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Georgina Bencsik

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

lacks notability —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayumashu (talk • contribs) 22:34, 13 January 2008
 * Comment - The article alleges that she's on the executive board of the Liberal Party of Canada. I'm unaware on if being on the exec board of major parties counts towards notability on its own or not.  That's going to be her main claim to notability though. matt91486 (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   -- --  pb30 < talk > 03:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability. Also note that there is likely COI issues as it looks like liberal party members have been busy editting the article. -- Whpq (talk) 15:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak de;lete This is stretching it just a little too far. DGG (talk) 05:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree with DGG above, the notability is stretched too thin here. Lankiveil (complaints 13:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   —Bearcat (talk) 22:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Of minimal notability at best; despite her inclusion in Category:Persons having won a party's nomination for the 40th Canadian federal election, I have yet to find any indication — not even on her own website, let alone in outside media sources — that she's actually won nomination to stand as an electoral candidate. If she has won a nomination, then merge into Liberal Party candidates, 40th Canadian federal election under the appropriate electoral district. If she hasn't, then delete without prejudice against recreation at a later date if circumstances warrant. Bearcat (talk) 22:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete can't find reliable independent sources of notability.--Slp1 (talk) 23:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GreenJoe (talk) 00:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.