Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geostick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 08:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Geostick

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism, recently invented concept Passportguy (talk) 11:41, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. No independent sourcing, no evidence that this has received any widespread coverage (or, for that matter, coverage within the Geocaching community). —C.Fred (talk) 11:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Go ahead, there's always someone somewhere enjoying making other peoples live miserable. Nyarnon (talk) 12:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete without prejudice Speaking as a fine weather and time permitting geocacher, I wouldn't fancy using a memory stick of uncertain provenance instead of a geocoin or travelbug. As to the article, looks like promotion of a new idea that isn't yet accepted. Geocoins and travel bugs are established items. If this takes off (not into my computer, it won't), then an article could be re-created. Peridon (talk) 12:22, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatant advert for a new concept. - Mgm|(talk) 18:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not an advert, but not notable, and also a neologism.  No prejudice to recreation, but the emo from Nyarnon is a bit of an insult. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 20:47, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.