Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geotab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:31, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Geotab

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:PROMO Only editors on page for months have only worked on this page, Previous AfC was denied. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Geotab Paul Timmins (talk) 21:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 02:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Appears properly cited with reliable independent sources. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - While it was made by someone related to the company, the article seems well written and well sourced from independent sources. Also found these 1, 2, 3. JTdale   Talk 17:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep While this article does have neutrality issues and does read a bit like an add, it has enough industry, media and governmental sources to meet notability requirements. The listed problem can be solved through editing, so deletion is not necessary. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.