Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geotecture

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 04:16, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)

Geotecture
Neologism, vanity. -- Nike 04:20, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC) I removed the tag. The supposedly copyrighted page is a Wikipedia mirror. That means that there is no definition in the dictionary, ergo a neologism. -- Nike 04:50, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Definition, not an article, and a copyrighted one at that (see ). Added the copyvio tag. -RidG (talk)  04:34, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Doh. Sorry, the Webster-Dictionary in the URL threw me off - didn't see the Wikipedia mirror. -RidG (talk)  05:58, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete dicdef. Rje 14:03, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, dicdef of a trivial neologism by a little-known author, possible stealth ad. Wyss 23:22, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete the article, but the info on the talk page should probably go to the Earth sheltering article. By the way, how old does a word have to be before it is no longer a neologism? LowKey 13:10, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * See the article on neologism. -- Nike 01:08, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.