Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geovictwardianism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete, nonsensical and positively asserts lack of notability. Guy (Help!) 14:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Geovictwardianism

 * — (View AfD)

According to the article, this is a "small movement" appearing in blogs. Google search for Geovictwardianism -wikipedia turns up about five uses (plus some unacknowledged Wikipedia mirrors). Let's wait until it's a larger movement appearing in reliable sources. FreplySpang 09:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I get 40 ghits, including Wikipedia and mirrors - isn't that a rum turn? Not up to snuff; England expects, you know, old chap? --Brianyoumans 09:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia does not exist to promote marginal strains of madness.Proabivouac 10:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No proper mainstream sources, and who is this "Albion" mentioned as its progenitor? Sam Blacketer 10:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - nn neologism. MER-C 10:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as the article describes itself as non-notable! SkierRMH 10:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.