Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Meyer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 19:11, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Gerald Meyer
not notable, vanity Avalon 02:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, okay. Croat Canuck 03:37, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. He is head of a research group at a world renowned research university, Johns Hopkins.  I will gladly change my vote if someone in his field, inorganic chemistry, determines he in not notable per WP:BIO.  Movementarian 06:02, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Has two patents to his credit. Capitalistroadster 06:31, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Movementarian. We should not have higher bars for notability for academics than for sportspeople. u p p l a n d 09:16, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep apparently passes the "professor test" per WP:BIO. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 12:11, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Movementarian and Just zis Guy, you know?. peachlette 21:45, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Movementarian, appears to meet WP:BIO notability criteria. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 22:27, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Professor at world-famous university with 2 patents is notable enough for me. If he's head of the group, it really needs to be in the article. - Mgm|(talk) 00:32, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just another professor. One hit from Google Books, 53 from Google Scholar. And two patents is nothing: a friend of mine has his name on five, and there's no way he's getting an article, despite working at two "world-famous" corporations. --Calton | Talk 00:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Was he a manager at either of these corporations? Because that's pretty much the corporate counterpart of a professor. - Mgm|(talk) 11:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * keep and please try to change our systemic bias Yuckfoo 01:05, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Borderline, based on assertions in article, but just notable enough for me. -- DS1953 05:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.