Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geraldine Donnelly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Geraldine Donnelly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minimally sourced biography of a person notable only as a local district councillor. As always, this is not a level of office that automatically entitles a person to have a Wikipedia article -- the lowest level of office in Northern Ireland that automatically guarantees a Wikipedia article to every holder of it is Stormont, while local councillors qualify for articles only if they can be referenced to a depth and range and volume of coverage that marks them out as much more special than most other local councillors. But the volume and depth and range of sourcing here is not demonstrating that: it's referenced to a smattering of the purely routine and expected local coverage of her death in the local media, with no evidence whatsoever of the UK-wide career coverage it would take to make a local councillor more notable than the norm. Bearcat (talk) 02:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

'''*Delete. ''' No notable councillor and "deputy" mayor of a population less than 100K population nor have any indication/sources to support any outside political career that support subject's notability. Fails WP:NPOL. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:37, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - run of the mill local politician without any claims to notability. We have deleted articles about local politicians with much more coverage. Bearian (talk) 00:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.