Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerard Meijer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Gerard Meijer

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable physiotherapist Mooonswimmer 00:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. For an article about a Dutch person, it is worthwhile checking the corresponding article in the Dutch-language Wikipedia at nl:Gerard Meijer (Feyenoord). I added some references from the Dutch article which may be enough to establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Medicine,  and Netherlands. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:02, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 08:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The source that Eastmain found in Het Vrije Volk had some promise, however, it is a human interest story and much of it is primary. I found a similar article at Rijnmond. This is not enough to establish notability. The fact that Nlwiki carries this isn't very informative either. Nlwiki is the worst larger Wikipedia. The text of the article can be fixed but is really bad. Among others it's about the matches Meijer has seen from nearby and the players he massaged. So WP:NOTINHERETED also applies. Creator was very active from 2006 to 2007, which appear as youthful years. Thank you, Mooonswimmer, for a useful nomination! gidonb (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not pass WP:GNG, and after additional sources the article still makes no legitimate claim to notability. IrishOsita (talk) 14:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.