Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Germaine Guex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn, and the other two initial delete comments have also been withdrawn. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Germaine Guex

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Clearly does not pass WP:GNG. Would normally be CSD material, except one editor repeatedly contests it (which, to be fair, is allowed). &mdash;cnzx (talk) 17:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator The foreign language references, I think, establish sufficient notability. &mdash;cnzx (talk) 17:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:47, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:47, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

*Delete -- Let 'em put it in the French wikipedia. Not of shred of interest for English speakers. If you cannot explain why the subject might interest me, then let it be gone. Rhadow (talk) 02:49, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:A7. The article has no claim of significance regarding the subject. North America1000 17:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added information about her notability. A leading Swiss psychanalyst, covered in dedicated articles in the International Dictionary of Psychoanalysis and in the Historical Dictionary of Switzerland . Clearly meets WP:GNG based on the references in the article.   Sandstein   18:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment – I have struck my !vote above, as the article now has a valid claim of significance (e.g. "Guex established a pioneering medical-pedagogical service in Monthey ...") North America1000 18:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. the contributions to the major encyclopedias in the field are enough to meet WP:PROF .  DGG ( talk ) 01:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Historic subject of significant importance. Documented in historicially notable sources. Valoem talk contrib 17:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.