Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/German Inland Waterways Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 00:08, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

German Inland Waterways Museum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ORG. my search under its German name reveals listings in tourist directories etc. in gbooks just includes mentions in travel books, nothing about museum history or uniqueness etc LibStar (talk) 13:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. The multiple listings in major travel books attest to the significance of the museum (for example, the Michelin Green Guide listing that calls it "one of the country's largest" ).  I would think that's enough to show notability, but in this case we also have content about this landmark building and how it was converted from a public swimming facility into a museum, from multiple sources including the de:Museum für Architektur und Ingenieurkunst NRW  and the state-funded architecture website de:baukunst-nrw . In my view, notability is conclusively established. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:NGO. —Kusma (t·c) 15:53, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep neither history nor uniqueness are part of WP:ORG. StarM 20:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:NGO/WP:GNG. It's in travel guides like Lonely Planet. SW3 5DL (talk) 22:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.