Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/German Romatnic Nationalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 23:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

German Romatnic Nationalism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Pseudo-historical POV rant, misquoting its sources, misspelled title, terrible English, hardly comprehensible. Unsalvagable. German romanticism exists, but there's nothing to merge here, and no need for redirecting because of the implausible misspelling. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Almost qualifies for speedy being almost patent nonsense, though it's more likely just a malformed attempt to create/translate an article by someone not very fluent in English.  Either way a more valid article exists elsewhere, and as no new information is presented here a merge would be unwarranted.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 15:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Unsalvagable" is the word; there is no way this could incrementally be transformed into something informative. Creator is a known edit warrior, which is evident from User_talk:Nasz, including archived sections b and c. (I don't think it unduly ad hominem to point this out here because the already tedious task of trying to make sense out of nonsense is made impossible if the original author is combative and keeps reverting others' attempts at improvement.) --Bwiki 16:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and agree completely with the nominator's rationale. Olessi 18:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, without prejudice to the creation of a decent article. German Romanticism is a huge topic and the properly spelled concept here is historically relevant . Stammer 19:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, woah, I feel sorry for that article. Can't redirect because of spelling, can't merge because of content, can delete though.  *Cremepuff 222*  " As cool as grapes... "  01:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. The whole area of German Romanticism on English Wikipedia needs overhauling (maybe we should import some articles from the German version). The main article we have on German Romanticism here isn't much better, since it contains gems like this: Weber was the first major composer to emerge as a wholesome product of the Romantic school (as opposed to unwholesome products like Hoffmann and Spohr, I presume). --Folantin 07:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Aminullah 10:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete if there's already an existing article that covers the same topic and is far better in quality, this page is useless. Acalamari 21:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, recreate it, then delete it again, just to be sure. JJL 03:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Pile-on delete as original research, barely comprehensible, redundant with existing articles, etcetera. A  ecis Brievenbus 23:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.