Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gernot Wagner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Not notable, lack of coverage by reliable sources. Drmies (talk) 02:19, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Gernot Wagner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deleted in the past:

Review contribs of the editor who recreated the article and the data in the infobox. Also note that the editor was able to paste a complete copy of the original article.

Also:

As was listed in the original deletion: WP:NOTABILITY, WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:PROMO, etc.  PeterWesco (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 14 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Setting aside the procedural problems, looking at the sources, every source is either a primary source or unreliable (except the Harvard Crimson which is too little to base an article on). Per WP:GNG there are not multiple independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in-depth. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 05:46, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.