Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerry Alanguilan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 22:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Gerry_Alanguilan
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject is famous only for one event and that too not covered by significant sources and certainly fails to meet WP:BLP and WP:BIO. The article is also an auto biography per WP:WWA Doublefrog (talk) 05:32, 5 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Doublefrog has been blocked indef as part of a sockpuppet investigation. Epeefleche (talk) 22:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 5.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 05:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Notable per WP:ANYBIO, WP:AUTHOR, and WP:GNG, with multiple awards and award nominations, and plenty of coverage in reliable sources, see e.g. . --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. Shouldn't this be closed, as the nom is not in good standing, and nobody else has !voted delete? Epeefleche (talk) 22:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, subject is notable per WP:ANYBIO, WP:AUTHOR, & WP:GNG, as stated by .--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep. Notable per WP:ANYBIO, WP:AUTHOR, & WP:GNG. The nom is indef blocked. All editors in good standing have !voted keep. Epeefleche (talk) 05:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - The author is notable enough to warrant his own box in Google's search engine and there are literally hundreds of sources that mention Gerry Alanguilan, many of which are reputable. Ormr2014 (talk) 23:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.