Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerry Joe Weise (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Gerry Joe Weise
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Extremely over the top promotion of non notable musician. Claimed charts are not goodcharts, award minor, Releases are on a small vanity label Blues Breaking Records, not Tower Records. He lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Page is bombarded with a LOT of sources but most are primary, listings, non reliable. Environmental Art of Gerry Joe Weise is self published, not a RS. Pure PR from a pair of tag teaming SPAs. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:37, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:37, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment By a quick count, 25 of the 198 sources presented in the article are refrenced to Vimeo. Many are offline. Picking thru whether he's notable will take a lot of work. If by chance any keep !voter wanders by, if you could present WP:THREE for me, that'd be much appreciated. SportingFlyer  T · C  13:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Based on 's vote below, I decided to ignore the massive number of sources in the article and just do my own, fairly broad WP:BEFORE search, which came up with precious little. No news articles whatsoever apart from a medium post. Will be willing to reconsider my vote if anyone comes forward with WP:THREE. Guess I should bold my delete vote. SportingFlyer  T · C  00:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment I think this might have a different problem. The article was pretty much created by two WP:SPAs (who marked almost every single edit as minor) with contributions from IPs, the last AfD had a new account pop up to save the article. He -may- be notable, but that article needs a massive cleanup and sourcing. Having been in 'active' since 1976, he should have -lots- of news or delete. - ChrisWar666 (talk) 23:44, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. I could find no sources of note in a search. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 03:23, 29 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.