Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gert Lotter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 00:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Gert Lotter

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

According to the site that's listed as a source, this player didn't actually play during the game he was in (http://cricketarchive.com/Archive/Players/442/442782/442782.html). I believe that means he's non-notable according to the rules for sportspeople. Mgm|(talk) 10:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you sure he didn't do any fielding? Polarpanda (talk) 11:35, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't be sure since I wasn't actually there. But if he did, we need the source in the article to actually back it up. - Mgm|(talk) 11:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - he played in the match, even though he neither batted nor bowled. It is an unusual case, as looking at the match scorecard it was played as a 12 a side fixture, but with only 11 to bat and field. We can't know whether he actually fielded or not, but he probably did as otherwise why name him in the starting 12? JH (talk page) 18:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - irrelevant what his contribution or lack of contributions were in the game, according to the WP:Cricket notability guidelines, he is notable as he has played in a List A game.The-Pope (talk) 11:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Per CRIN. Chances are that there will be other List A cricket appearances too, given his age. Johnlp (talk) 21:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:CRIN and Johnlp. Harrias (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:CRIN. He played and that is enough, never mind that his contribution wasn't significant. Unless people want to overturn WP:CRIN, this article should stay, and this probably isn't the place to discuss the guideline. On another note, it looks likely that he's played youth rugby for Namibia . Nev1 (talk) 22:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep he played. Some soccer players from terrible teams, eg, American Samoa, who lost 31-0 to Australia, probably played, but never touched the ball....  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) (Invincibles finally at Featured topic candidates) 22:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.