Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetAuto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

GetAuto

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not seem to meet WP:ORG. All of the sources seem to be rehashed press releases, and none seem to really meet WP:RS. 2 of the sources are from the subject. A search for sources did not turn up anything aside from more rehashed press releases, advertisements, or promotional websites.  TLSuda  (talk) 00:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Appears to be an ad with references generated by its corporate owner?--Rpclod (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: As per the nominator, I am finding nothing more than routine PR and listings coverage for this firm. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 19:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - Promo bollox that serves no purpose here. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:32, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't meet WP:NGO. Can't find WP:RS WP:Third party sources.    Jim Carter (from public cyber)  07:27, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTADVERT. Fleet Command (talk) 07:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.