Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetRight


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 02:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

GetRight

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Schuym1 (talk) 02:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't find anything either--not a single meaningful hit on GNews. OK, I found one, but this is hardly in-depth coverage. Drmies (talk) 03:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:01, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not sure why you'd expect to find _news_ coverage of a piece of software. This particular program has received positive reviews in most of the major PC magazines (e.g.   ) and so seems to satisfy WP:N. JulesH (talk) 09:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. This was one of the most popular download managers in the 90's. See for instance . decltype 18:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per JulesH that seems about right to me. JBsupreme (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.