Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get A Grip (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 18:52, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Get A Grip (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book lacking Ghits and GNEWS of substance. Article created by publisher's marketing group. Fails WP:NOTBOOK. red dog six (talk) 23:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 12 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - no independent coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 19:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm unable to find evidence of this meeting WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK.  Gong   show  18:49, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia as it lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Meh, delete. Googling News archives and Books with "Get A Grip" wickman paton turns up nothing worth mentioning. CtP  (t • c) 18:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.