Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get It Pumped


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Not redirecting, as this isn't a plausible search term. --Core desat  06:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Get It Pumped

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable term, redirected to Sexual intercourse but author keeps reverting it back Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 19:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, at best dicdef, at worst, complete WP:NFT. The Rambling Man 19:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

The term is notable, one of the quickest, popular scottish term, and the redirected article has no relavence to the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RFCscottRFC (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per WP:NFT or WP:NEO. Section9 20:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, by the article's own description NFT/NEO. --Dhartung | Talk 20:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sexual intercourse as nominator and protect Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

'''The article itself states it's in an online dictonary (see external links) and it's something more than made up from school. It's more like the tv, where someone thought of it, created it and made a extremly popular invention (in this case, the term). It's quickly being one of the most used terms in Scotland.''' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.23.117.114 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete and to Mr. Bold, you are describing a neologism, which are normally not kept. JuJube 01:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism. No redirect. This is not a term anyone uses, the redirect is ill-advised, and would be a manner of "reward" to the creators of this article. Delete completely, salt if necessary. &mdash; coe l acan t a lk  &mdash; 04:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sexual intercourse. 'Pump' is a widely used slang term as a drop in replacement for the verb to have sex, just like "bone", "shag" or "poke". Coelacan - your statement "this is not a term anyone uses" is utterly wrong. Please see this Google search for clear evidence of that. CupOBeans 01:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ha. "Pumped in the ass" is a rather different term than "get it pumped". This is an article about the phrase, not about the single word "pump". I stand by my call. We should treat this no differently than spam. Salt, no redirect. No rewards for spamming Wikipedia. &mdash; coe l acan t a lk  &mdash; 01:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - as nominator of article and redirect, even I would say that you cannot use the google search listed as a fair argument, 'Get it pumped' and 'pumped in the ass' are 2 different phrases! Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 02:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment: An appropriate quote from another recent AFD: "Delete don't redirect. We should be giving due weight to this term. And that due weight is zero." So well put. — coe l acan t a lk  — 05:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Aren't neologisms under the umbrella of patent nonsense, last time I checked? God, this shouldhave died long ago. Niki Whimbrel 16:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.