Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Johnny Week (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 11:25, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Get Johnny Week
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. When I first nominated this article for deletion in August 2007, it was kept. However, I feel that Wikipedia has moved on so much, and AfD has become much stricter, that it's worth giving it another look. I feel that this storyline is not notable; it had no cultural impact, no long-term effect on the programme etc. There are also few reliable sources in the article (2 are primary BBC sources and the other 3 are trash tabloids/magazines). Overall, this subject is about as notable as every other soap opera storyline ever, and that's not what Wiki does. Dale 02:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is, for a soap-format show, the equivalent of an episode article (see WP:EPISODE). This appears from the sources to be a "standout episode" (for negative rather than positive reasons) and there is enough independently sourced material to justify splitting it out of an "individual season" page.  - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:PLOT as it is not a "plot-only description of fictional works". There is plenty of real-world information. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 14:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep there's room for expansion and passes Plot.  GunGagdin Moan 10:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.