Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Out (board game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. As a group. Perhaps renominate separately.  Sandstein  07:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Get Out (board game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable board game. Can't find anything that shows notability. Natg 19 (talk) 03:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 03:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages, as non-notable board games:


 * Comment (nominator) I bundled in a few more games that were produced by this company, as their articles were lightly sourced, if at all, and they seem to be non-notable. I question how many of the bluelinks here are actually notable. Natg 19 (talk) 04:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect all to Cheapass Games (for Get Out and Bitin') or to James Ernest. I may have edited these way in the past, but they clearly aren't notable today, but they are valid search terms so they can be redirected safely to the notable brand or designer. Probably the same with the bluelinks mentioned above. --M asem (t) 04:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Falling and fightball both have a fair number of reviews ( and both have a fair number of reviews listed).  I'm leaning keep on those.  Redirect the others per Masem. Hobit (talk) 13:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep all Falling is quite notable and the bundle just requires improvement per WP:ATD; WP:NOTCLEANUP; WP:NOTPAPER; and WP:PRESERVE. Andrew D. (talk) 13:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Do you have refs that show that Falling is notable? Natg 19 (talk) 20:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Falling was the first published real time card game in the hobby games market. It was followed by BRAWL, which is at least as notable as any other CCG, and then came Fightball and Light Speed. The real-time card game mechanic is quite notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.118.80.172 (talk) 03:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * It was better to make a separate nomination for each. I will check these soon. Rzvas (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Falling and Fightball. Redirect the rest. Rzvas (talk) 23:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.